The Katechon, the Eschatological State of Exception, and the Twilight of Civilization: A Critique of Dugin

 

 

The photo shows Alexandr Dugin at the opening ceremony of the European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats association on April 11, 2017, at the National Hall (Kansallissali) in Helsinki. The photograph was taken by Juha Molari, to whom Alexandr Dugin also privately responded regarding why there is such a strong trend in Europe to speak of 'hybrid threats'.

The current state and potential darkening of European and Finnish civilization can be examined through the Lacanian concept of the lathouse: humanity appears to be entering a warehouse where being is hidden. The neoliberal system stores those subjects whose intellectual and physiological value has been reduced to zero. In this process, truth is not revealed but stored as mechanical meaninglessness, where the human being is merely a remnant of a substance alienated even from itself. This emptying of existence is a direct consequence of the process Jürgen Habermas calls the "colonization of the lifeworld." In this state, the steering media of economy and administration—money and power—penetrate the core of the family and civil society, replacing linguistic understanding with technical control [Huttunen, 20.6.2010][Manninen, 2020].

The environment of existence has increasingly become part of a global spectacle where the human face—what Giorgio Agamben calls the "passion of manifestation" and the only possible location of community—is covered by biometric codes and administrative indifference [Dillon, 6.6.2022]. In his work L'aperto: L'uomo e l'animale (2022), Agamben sought to find the possibility of being human, yet he has also noted that in the coming years, there will be "only monks and criminals." Agamben points out that internment and the principle of schutzhaft (protective custody) are linked to a practice of preventive power, where a person who has committed no crime is detained if it simply seems possible that they might endanger "social security." Such use of power connects to the global moral collage that Alexandr Dugin and Konstantin Malofeyev describe as "Satan's civilization" [Ikonen, 2022].

Eschatological State of Exception and the Rot of the Elite

The eschatological views of Dugin and Agamben converge in the claim that Western modernity has reached its endpoint. While Dugin declares directly that "Western modernity is the Antichrist" [Дугин, 5.2.2026], Agamben approaches the subject through a juridical-theological analysis in which the state of exception has become the rule, reducing the human being to "bare life" (zoe) [Agamben, 2017]. The COVID-19 pandemic formed a decisive eschatological event for both: for Agamben, it was the breakthrough of "biosecurity" [Agamben, 2020], and for Dugin, it was the "gift of the plague" (dar chumy), which forced man to face the truth of his existence without the protections offered by the liberal world [Дугин, 17.3.2020].

In this "infernal politics," law and life have become fatally separated. Agamben reminds us that in Christian theology, "hell is the only juridical institution that has no end," and the current model of global economy is, in reality, fundamentally infernal [Agamben, 2012]. This system serves Mammon, which according to Hollis Phelps is not just a moral attitude but an independent actor that determines the subject's relationship with others and the world [Oudshoorn, 2020]. In Russian discourse, the "Epstein files" of 2026 are presented as evidence of this corruption. According to Malofeyev and Dugin, Western power is organized around pedophilia and blackmail, aiming for a "Greater Israel" as a planet-wide governance model under Zionist influence (ZOG) [Малофеев, 7.2.2026][Дугин, 31.1.2026; 7.2.2026].

The Katechon – Geopolitical Tool and Theological Riddle

At the center of this analysis is the restrainer mentioned in Paul's Second Letter to the Thessalonians, the katechon (2 Thess. 2:6–7). In Dugin's vision, the katechon is a dynamic, fighting, and religiously charged force. He views the "ideocracy" of the Islamic Revolution in Iran as an exemplary model where religion and spirit guide all state action, preparing for the coming of the hidden Imam, the Mahdi—a concept he parallels with the Orthodox idea of the katechon [Разум и Вера, 1.5.2016]. According to Professor Maria Engström of Uppsala University, the concept of the katechon has become the foundation of Russian state ideology against Western "anomie" (lawlessness and chaos) [Engström, 2014].

For Dugin, artificial intelligence is the "physical embodiment of Satan's mind" [Дугин, 5.2.2026]. This technological interpretation is also supported by Robert Paulson, who sees thinkers of posthumanism like Yuval Noah Harari as direct examples of the spirit of the Antichrist seeking to make man a god through technology [Paulson, 2.3.2022]. Paul VanderKlay, in turn, points out that the current secular administration has adopted the role of a confessional church, seeking to manage the thoughts of citizens. Liberalism acts as a kind of modern katechon in its attempt to maintain order, but it easily turns into its opposite by rejecting the higher Logos [VanderKlay, 4.12.2025].

Critical Voices from Within Russia and theology

Dugin’s state-centered interpretation of the katechon faces severe internal criticism. Daniil Korpusov provides a historical-analytical overview showing how the theological term was transformed into a tool for justifying autocratic power through the "Moscow as the Third Rome" narrative [Корпусов, 8.2.2023]. However, Father Serafim (Serafim Medvedev) of the catacomb church movement emphasizes that the true restrainer is "the inner purity of the soul, not any earthly empire." He warns against "Tsarebozhniki" (Tsar-worshippers) who wait for a new Tsar as a savior without inner repentance [Медведев, 11.12.2025]. Similarly, Pavel Grammatik, a proponent of "uranopolitism" (heavenly citizenship), rejects the unique claim of Russia as the katechon, arguing that the biblical restrainer lives within the entire Christian civilization and cannot be appropriated by a single state to justify war [Грамматик, 23.10.2023].

Maria Engström has described how Russian conservative intellectuals, such as Dugin and Zakhar Prilepin, see the war in Ukraine as a necessary "cleansing" and a return to the national code [Engström, 3.5.2022]. This militarized spirituality connects to Petter Lindberg's analysis of "holy bombs": Patriarch Kirill has harnessed the Orthodox Church to justify the war as a battle against the Western "Antichrist" [Lindberg, 31.3.2022]. The "atomic Orthodoxy" launched by Egor Kholmogorov combines nuclear weapons and faith as Russia's enduring shields [Lindberg, 31.3.2022; Engström, 2014].

The Katechon – Back to the Bible!

When Dugin and Malofeyev build an image of Russia as the "last fortress" and the civilizational restrainer, they rely on terminology rooted in Paul's Second Letter to the Thessalonians. Paul writes: “And now you know what is restraining (to katekhon), that he may be revealed in his own time. For the mystery of lawlessness (mysterion tes anomias) is already at work; only He who now restrains (ho katekhon) will do so until He is taken out of the way.” (2 Thess. 2:6–7). In Dugin's hands, this theological mystery becomes a justification for "atomic Orthodoxy," but exegetical examination shows that such politicization ignores the complexity of the original text.

The greatest rift between Dugin and biblical scholarship arises from the "radical hypothesis" presented by Michael R. Stead and Donald Robinson. While traditional and Duginist interpretations see the katechon as a "good" restrainer, Stead and Robinson offer an opposite interpretation of the Greek verb katechein [Stead, 2008][Robinson, 1964]. According to them, ho katekhon might not be a protector at all, but rather a satanic "occupier" or "oppressor" who currently holds the world and prevents the full liberation of the church. Stead argues that the term refers to Satan himself, occupying God's world and delaying the messianic fulfillment. In light of this analysis, Dugin’s demand for Russia to act as a "brake" on history is turned on its head: what he calls civilizational protection might actually be part of the mystery of lawlessness holding humanity in its grip [Stead, 2008; Krodel, 1990].

Another central challenge to Dugin’s state messianism comes from the theories of Roger David Aus. Aus suggests that the background of 2 Thess. 2:6-7 lies in the Hebrew verb 'asar, which means not only to restrain but also to "close the womb" [Aus, 1977]. In this view, the restrainer is God Himself, who delays the return of His Son solely out of patience, so that the Great Commission and the plan of evangelization may be fulfilled (cf. 2 Pet. 3:9). According to Aus, the issue is not political institutions, but the salvation-historical schedule set by God (en to heautou kairo). This places "atomic Orthodoxy" and military cleansing in a strange light: they appear as a form of haste that fails to recognize God's sovereignty over the course of history [Aus, 1977; Cullmann, 1936; Strobel, 1961].

The question of the "man of lawlessness" (ho anthropos tes anomias) also requires a return to the text. Fritz W. Röcker connects the concept strongly to the Jewish Belial tradition and reminds us that many scholars, such as Wilhelm Bousset, saw in him historical echoes of, for example, Emperor Caligula's attempt to erect his statue in the Jerusalem temple [Röcker, 2009; Bousset, 1895]. Most importantly, one must note where the lawless one positions himself. Karol Piotr Kulpa [2022], following Tyconius, reminds us that evil is not merely an external, geographical, or political enemy (like "the West"), but is present within the church, in its "duality." The man of lawlessness seeks to take God's place specifically in the temple [Stefanovic, 2023]. This makes any political power claiming to be "holy" biblically suspicious: power sitting in the temple is often precisely that which has distorted the Gospel for its own glory [Luther, 1523].

Exegetical analysis also indicates that the restrainer "being taken out of the way" (ek mesou genetai) may refer to a voluntary withdrawal or an exit from the stage [Griffiths, 2004; Rigaux, 1956]. Johannes Munck argued decades ago that Paul himself or his work of evangelization was the factor restraining the Antichrist [Munck, 1954; Röcker, 2009]. If the restrainer is a spiritual mission or the Word of God, then the salvation of civilization is not found in national borders or nuclear weapons, but in faith and the proclamation of the word.

Ultimately, the words of 2 Thessalonians serve as a warning against the sacralization of power. Janusz Kucicki [1967] compares Paul's eschatology to Qumran texts, where the power of evil is strictly limited according to the schedule set by God. Man cannot arbitrarily accelerate or decelerate this process through political means. Dugin’s appropriation of the katechon concept is thus a civilizational distortion: it attempts to turn Paul's warning into a ruler's mandate, even though the original text refers to a deeper, divine mystery beyond human control [Byrd, 8.12.2023; Munck, 1954].

The Lutheran Christological Counterpoint

Martin Luther’s eschatology offers a classic and deeply Christological focal point that both Alexandr Dugin’s political messianism and Giorgio Agamben’s juridical-theological analysis largely overlook. For Luther, the Antichrist is not primarily an external, geographical, or civilizational force—such as Dugin’s "Satanic West"—but the "Man of Sin" who takes his seat specifically in God's temple, the Christian congregation (2 Thess. 2:3–4) [Luther, 1523; Melanchton, 1537]. In Luther's eschatology, the course of history is a constant battle between the Word of God and Satan, and the Antichrist’s greatest deception is to confuse the two kingdoms by turning spiritual power into earthly mastery and demanding obedience to human authority as a condition for salvation [Luther, 1523; Pieper, 559–560].

Where Dugin seeks to re-sacralize state power and yearns for a "Holy Empire," Luther emphasizes the doctrine of the two kingdoms. Secular authority, when successful, is "God's bailiff" (Gottes Vogt), a pragmatic order-maintaining power whose task is to "restrain injustice" and the rage of evil, preventing the world from plunging into premature chaos [Luther, 1525]. Although Luther does not specifically use the term katechon in this context, his description of the task of the authorities corresponds in substance to the idea of a force restraining lawlessness. However, this is not a saving force or a metaphysical summit, but a necessary institution for the containment of evil in this age. Luther warns that the sacralization of power into an Antichristian monarchy is precisely that "mystery of lawlessness" where man exalts himself to the level of God [Luther, 1525; Melanchton, 1537].

The analysis of the Antichrist by Luther and Philipp Melanchton connects directly to 2 Thessalonians: the Antichrist rules within the church, abolishes God's law, and replaces it with his own regulations [Melanchton, 1537]. The mark of the Antichrist is the use of Christ's name and office while simultaneously denying the true work of Christ [Luther, 1532]. In Dugin's model, where missiles and shells crush the "kingdom of the Antichrist," the basic Lutheran theological idea is ignored: the Antichrist's kingdom is not crushed by physical weapons but is destroyed by the "breath of the Lord's mouth"—the proclaimed Gospel—which reveals the mystery of lawlessness and strips away its mask of holiness [Luther, 1537, ”Donatio Constantini”].

Lutheran eschatology emphasizes the certainty of the individual conscience in relation to Christ, whereas Dugin’s eschatology is collective and civilizational. For Luther, the end times are not just a distant future; they began in the time of the apostles, and at their core is the question of which doctrine prevails in the world [Luther, 1532]. The Christian should not fear the crumbling of the world or the power of the Antichrist, for faith is the only force capable of distinguishing the true light from the illusions of the devil [Luther, 1530-1532]. When Dugin and Agamben see the pandemic or technological control as eschatological signs, Luther would remind us that the greatest distress and deception occur within the congregation when the pure Gospel is darkened [Luther, ”Hengellinen virvoittaja”, 407].

Ultimately, Luther’s response to the experience of the "burning house" is to flee to the safety of God's Word. In the twilight of civilization, salvation is found neither in an earthly empire nor in an authoritarian tradition, but in the certainty of faith amidst the world’s collapse. Luther's eschatology demands trust in a victory that is utter foolishness to the visible world and its geopolitical power struggles [Pieper, 590; Stang, 2020].

The End of Civilization or God’s Patience?

The current crisis of the geopolitical and theological world crystallizes in a struggle over time. Krzysztof Karczewski and Dugin outline a vision of "Russian accelerationism," where passive restraint is replaced by an active counter-offensive against the "Eschatology of Baal"—a technological project aimed at transcending or destroying humanity [Karczewski, 4.3.2020][Дугин, 4.3.2026]. However, Dustin J. Byrd warns that politicizing the katechon concept provides a mandate for dictatorship and sacralizes wars of aggression [Byrd, 8.12.2023].

In the twilight of civilization, the question of the katechon returns to the source of power. Is it the Empire, the law, or God's grace? Agamben's analysis of the state of exception and biopower serves as an intellectual-historical warning, while Luther calls for trust in a victory that is madness to the world. Ultimately, the theological perspective remains a quiet warning: what we consider a protector may be an oppressor, and what we consider a delay is actually God's merciful time [Munck, 1954; Stead, 2008].

KIRJALLISUUS

Agamben, Giorgio (2012). The Church and the Kingdom. Transl. By Leland de Durantaye. New York Calcutta. Seagull Books.
Agamben, Giorgio (2017). The Omnibus. Homo Sacer. Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio (2020). Quodlibet- A che punto siamo? L’epidemia come politica. Urtext Ltd.
Agamben, Giorgio (2022). Quando la casa brucia. Seagull Books London Ltd.
Aus, Roger David (1977). ”The Relevant Textual Data of Isaiah 66:7–11 and the Messianic Woes of 2 Thess 2:1–12.” Vigiliae Christianae 31, no. 4.
Beckenström, Karl (8.2.2026). "Moraalinen ylikuormitus ja eliitin naamiot." Posi-TV.
Bousset, Wilhelm (1895). Der Antichrist in der Überlieferung des Judentums, des neuen Testaments und der alten Kirche.
Byrd, Dustin J. (8.12.2023). The Russian Restrainer of the Apocalypse: The Katechon as a Political Category of Empire Building. Youtube.
Cullmann, Oscar (1936). ”Le caractère eschatologique du devoir missionnaire et de l'unité de l'Église.”
Dillon, Brian (6.6.2022). "Giorgio Agamben - A Face In The Crowd." Frieze.
Дугин, Александр (17.3.2020). ”Пандемия и экзистенциальная философия (дар чумы)”. vk.com.
Дугин, Александр (31.1.2026). ”Настоящий коллапс Запада: Файлы Эпштейна раскрыли цивилизацию сатаны”. Tsargrad.tv.
Дугин, Александр (5.2.2026). ”Western Modernity as Antichrist: Epstein, Zionism, and Eschatology”. Alexanderdugin.substack.com.
Дугин, Александр (7.2.2026). ”The Epsteino-Centric Model: A Sociopolitical Analysis of the Western Power Core”. Alexanderdugin.substack.com.
Дугин, Александр (4.3.2026). The Eschatology of Acceleration: Baal, the Katechon, and the War for Time
Дугин, Александр & Land, Nick (6.10.2025). ”Nick Land and Alexander Dugin on Liberalism, Empire, and the Eschaton”. Youtube/Substack.
Engström, Maria (2014). ”Contemporary Russian Messianism and New Russian Foreign Policy.” Contemporary Security Policy, 35(3).
Engström, Maria (25.11.2011). ”Imperiedröm ger luft åt rysk nykonservatism.” Svenska Dagbladet.
Engström, Maria (9.2.2026). ”The Dark Enlightenment and the Return of Political Theology in Russia and the United States.” Ridl.io.
Enright, Lyle (12.6.2020). ”Agamben and Francis After the Quarantine.” Church Life Journal.
Грамматик, Павел Васильев (23.10.2023). ”Что такое Катехон? Правильно ли учат сторонники теории Москва - третий Рим?” Youtube.
Griffiths, Paul J. (2006). The Vice of Curiosity: An Essay on Intellectual Appetite. Canadian Mennonite University Press.
Hagman, Minna (21.5.2020). ”Elämänmuodot koronan aikaan.” Tutkijaliitto.
Huttunen, Rauno (20.6.2010). ”Habermas, Jürgen.” Filosofia.fi.
Ikonen, Vili (2022). ”Minun täytyi tunnustaa rikos, mutta en tiennyt mikä rikos vaatii tunnustamistani.” Kandidaatintutkielma, Jyväskylän yliopisto.
Karczewski, Krzysztof (4.3.2020). ”Eschatologia przyspieszenia: Baal, Katechon i wojna o czas.”
Корпусов, Даниил (8.2.2023). ”История русской конспирологии.” Youtube.
Kotsko, Adam (19.12.2018). ”Agamben on philosophy and theology.” Itself.blog.
Kulpa, Karol Piotr (2022). Tyconius and the Mystery of Iniquity.
Lammi, Tuomas (28.4.2020). ”Agambenin pelko.” Paatos.fi.
Lindberg, Petter (31.3.2022). ”Heliga bomber – när den ortodoxa kyrkan rättfärdigar kriget i Ukraina.” Yle.
Literature and Theory (8.10.2025). ”Giorgio Agamben: Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life.” Youtube.
Luther, Martti (1520). ”Wider die Bulle des Endchrists” (WA 6,614-629).
Luther, Martti (1523). ”De instituendis ministris Ecclesiae” (WA 12,169-196).
Luther, Martti (1525). ”Wider die räuberischen und mörderischen Rotten der Bauern” (WA 18,357-361).
Luther, Martti (1530-1532). ”Wochenpredigten über Matth. 5-7” (WA 32,1,299-544).
Luther, Martti (1532). ”Etliche schöne Predigten aus der ersten Epistel S. Johannis Von der Liebe” (WA 36, 416-477).
Luther, Martti (1537). ”Die Schmalkaldischen Artikel” (WA 50,192-254).
Luther, Martti (1537). ”Einer aus den hohen Artikeln des päpstlichen Glaubens, genannt Donatio Constantini” (WA 50,69-89).
Малофеев, Константин (7.2.2026). ”Sionistskoe okkupacionnoe pravitelstvo”. Tsargrad.tv.
Manninen, Tuomas (2020). ”Onko tässä yhteiskunnassa mitään järkeä?” Pro gradu -tutkielma, Jyväskylän yliopisto.
Медведев, Серафим (11.12.2025). ”О возрождении и ожидании царя.” Youtube.
Melanchton, Philipp (1537). Paavin valta ja johtoasema. Tunnustuskirjat.
Miettinen, Timo (8.4.2020). ”Koronakriisi haastaa vapaan yhteiskunnan.” Sitra.
Munck, Johannes (1954). Paul and the Salvation of Mankind. SCM Press.
ODC TV (9.7.2024). KATEHON : Russia against antichrist (Exclusive documentary). Youtube.
Oudshoorn, Daniel (2020). ”Jesus, Mammon, and the Impossible Presence of the Kingdom of God.” Interview with Hollis Phelps.
Paulson, Robert (2.3.2022). ”A Real Life Type Of Antichrist - Yuval Noah Harari.” Youtube.
Pieper, Franz (1995). Kristillinen Dogmatiikka. SLEY-kirjat.
Разум и Вера (1.5.2016). ”Вечный Иран: Рабочая поездка группы «Катехон»”. Youtube.
Robinson, Donald (1964). ”The Distinction between τὸ κατέχον and ὁ κατέхων in 2 Thessalonians 2:6-7.” Studia Evangelica.
Röcker, Fritz W. (2009). Belial und Katechon: Eine Untersuchung zu 2 Thess 2,1-12 und 1 Thess 4,13-5,11. Mohr Siebeck.
Stang, Charles M. (2020). ”Review: Giorgio Agamben, the Church, and Me.” Harvard Divinity Bulletin.
Stead, Michael R. (2008). ”The Restrainer of 2 Thessalonians 2:6-7.”
Stefanovic, Ranko (2023). The Man of Lawlessness and the Temple.
Strobel, August (1961). Untersuchungen zum eschatologischen Verzögerungsproblem.
VanderKlay, Paul (4.12.2025). ”State-Church vs Liberalism as Katechon and/or AntiChrist.” Youtube.
Vila, Héctor (25.10.2017). ”Donald Trump, Homo Sacer: The Sacred and Accursed Sovereign.” Medium.

 

 

 _ _ _ 

Juha Molari, BBA, Ph.D.

March 2, 2026 in Helsinki